In recent years, there has been a growing concern over censorship in Florida, particularly in the education system. Much of this concern has centered around Governor Ron DeSantis and his attempts to control what is taught in the state's public schools.
HB 1467 is a Florida bill that has caused waves as it proposed that schoolbooks must be reviewed by a district employee holding a valid educational media specialist certificate to ensure that the literature is free of pornographic or race-centered content. This means that the Florida Board of Education would ban the teaching of certain books in public schools. The banning of topics centered around race has caused uproar among both students and educators alike as many have considered this to be an erasure of a part of our nation’s history and how the government and society has treated African Americans and other minority groups. Among the books targeted by the rule are works by celebrated authors like Toni Morrison and Ralph Ellison. By banning certain topics to be discussed in schools, many are considering this bill to be an attack on academic freedom and a disservice to our nation’s youth as they will grow up without learning the context around important historical events. Another related but distinct issue: a bill known as the Stop W.O.K.E. Censorship Act, which has been introduced in the Florida legislature would require public universities and colleges to survey their faculty members and students to identify so-called "controversial" topics, and then submit reports to the state detailing how they plan to address these topics in their classrooms. Critics of the bill argue that it is a thinly veiled attempt to chill free speech on college campuses and to create a culture of self-censorship among students and faculty.
Taken together, these two bills paint a worrying picture of censorship in Florida. It is clear that Governor DeSantis and other conservative lawmakers in the state are determined to exert control over what is taught in public schools and universities. They seem to believe that certain books and topics are inherently dangerous or controversial, and that they have a duty to shield students from them. This attitude is deeply misguided, and runs counter to the principles of academic freedom and free speech. Of course, it is important to acknowledge that censorship is not a new phenomenon in Florida or elsewhere. Throughout history, there have been many attempts to control what people read, watch, and listen to. But the current situation in Florida is particularly concerning because it is taking place in the context of a broader culture war that is tearing the country apart. Conservatives and progressives are at loggerheads over a range of issues, and censorship has become a weapon in that conflict.
The situation in Florida is reflective of a broader trend of censorship and suppression of information and ideas across the United States. In recent years, there has been a growing concern about free speech and academic freedom, with many academics and journalists being censored or silenced for expressing their opinions. The rise of cancel culture, which is the practice of punishing individuals or groups for holding or expressing unpopular opinions, has contributed to this problem. Cancel culture has become a powerful tool for those who want to silence their opponents, and it has been used to target individuals across the political spectrum. One of the biggest challenges facing defenders of free speech is how to balance the need for open and free debate with the need to protect individuals from hate speech and other forms of harmful speech. This is a delicate balancing act that requires careful consideration and thoughtful policies.
Without the ability to freely express our opinions and ideas, we cannot have a functioning democracy. As such, it is important for individuals and organizations to continue to fight for these fundamental rights and to hold those who seek to suppress them accountable. In addition to the recent controversies surrounding book censorship in Florida, the state has also made headlines for a recent incident involving a stature. The controversy began when a principal in a Tallahassee charter school was forced to resign over a lesson on Michelangelo’s David statue after complaints from a parent saying that the statue was pornographic in nature. The parent claimed that the statue's exposed genitalia was not appropriate for students to see.
The decision to cover up the statue was met with widespread criticism from students, teachers, and art enthusiasts alike. Some argued that covering up the statue was a form of censorship, while others pointed out the hypocrisy of censoring a work of art that had been celebrated for centuries for its beauty and artistic merit. The statue is not pornographic in nature as it has no sexual undertones, its a statue that celebrate the anatomy of man and has artistic value. The incident also brought to light the larger issue of censorship in the arts and if parents should have a say in whats taught in school curriculums. While many may argue that certain works of art are not appropriate for certain audiences, the question becomes: who gets to decide what is appropriate and what isn't? Is it the government, school boards, or individual parents? And what are the consequences of censoring works of art that may be deemed controversial or offensive by some?
It is important to remember that the arts have always been a reflection of society and have served as a means for artists to express their ideas, beliefs, and values. Censoring works of art can hinder the free exchange of ideas and limit the opportunities for individuals to engage with new perspectives and viewpoints. The act of censorship can lead to a distorted view of reality, as it selectively removes information that might challenge the dominant narrative. This can be particularly dangerous in cases where the censored information relates to marginalized groups or contentious issues, such as the Holocaust, slavery, or civil rights movements. When we censor this information, we risk perpetuating the same mistakes and injustices that occurred in the past.
Furthermore, censorship often leads to a lack of critical thinking and inquiry, as individuals are not exposed to diverse viewpoints and perspectives. This can limit our ability to develop empathy and understanding for those who may have different experiences or worldviews than our own. In an increasingly interconnected and globalized world, this type of narrow-mindedness can have dire consequences. censorship is a form of control, and it is often employed by those in power to maintain their dominance over others. By limiting access to information and suppressing dissenting voices, those in power can manipulate public opinion and maintain their grip on authority. This is why it is so important that we remain vigilant against censorship and continue to fight for our right to access information and ideas, even if they make us uncomfortable or challenge our preconceptions. Only by doing so can we create a society that is truly just, equitable, and free.
Ultimately, the fight against censorship in Florida will require a sustained effort from educators, activists, and concerned citizens. The incidents of censorship in Florida, whether it be in the form of book banning or covering up works of art, highlight the need for a continued conversation about the importance of free expression and the potential consequences of limiting it. Censorship has the power to erase history and limit access to important information. When we censor information, we are not only limiting the ability of individuals to learn and grow, but we are also removing important aspects of our collective history. It will require us to stand up for academic freedom and to resist attempts to sanitize history and art or to suppress free speech. It will require us to be vigilant and to speak out whenever we see attempts to silence dissenting voices. And it will require us to recognize that censorship is not just a threat to our individual rights, but to the health of our democracy as a whole.
Comments